|
Post by Tangerine Sherlock on Jun 11, 2011 12:59:00 GMT 1
A little stat for you alll
Blackpool paid just £45,000 to agents last year.
Wolves spent £1.2m, Wigan £2.4m and Man City £9m.
|
|
|
Post by bigjohncraven on Jun 11, 2011 20:32:22 GMT 1
It's funny on the one hand I'm proud of the fact we didn't give much money to the leaches,but on the other hand I wonder how many of the missed signings we had last year is down to not paying the feckers? Or is this the consequence of swimming against the tide?
|
|
|
Post by yenilira on Jun 11, 2011 20:44:45 GMT 1
'Swimming against the tide' methinks, John.
How many players last year did we miss out on because KO (in his wisdom, and respect to him for that) didn't want to pay agents' fees, and so far this year, again, how many?
Apart from the fact that we could have got the lad McGuire from the Dons at a knock-down fee last month.
YL
|
|
|
Post by pikeypete on Jun 12, 2011 0:16:05 GMT 1
Wolves £1.2m....which no doubt included a fee for Adam Hammill who cost a mere £500k. It maybe all becomes a bit clearer now why he didn't come to Bloomers. You have to pay the middle man.
False economy Karl.
I admire the stance against the parasites of footy but sometimes you need to break your own rules.
|
|