|
Post by Tangerine Sherlock on Jul 27, 2012 19:17:00 GMT 1
What he did or did not do has already been covered by the law courts so why bring it back up FA? The same organization that allows Barton to go to another club to get his ban served out quicker. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/19021184
|
|
|
Post by yeoldetangerine on Jul 27, 2012 20:00:09 GMT 1
I think their view, and, to be fair I'm not sure I disagree, is that the level of proof for a criminal charge is far higher than that for a disciplinary. The latter is closer to civil level, balance of probability. And I for one fear he has got away with allsorts cos he can afford the best Silks money can buy.
|
|